The Other

When information is given in a serial manner, we tend to remember information in the beginning of the sequence, called the primacy effect, and information in the end of the sequence, called the recency effect. Consequently, information given

in the middle of the sequence is typically forgotten, or not recalled as easily. This study predicts that the recency

effect is stronger than the primacy effect because the information that is most recently learned is

still in working memory when asked to be recalled. On the other hand, information

that is learned first still has to go through a retrieval process.

The Path

As part of the development of thought none of the concepts of eternity can not be considered original. All of them are

deduced from the observations of the durability of different things. If life is not the same, though some things continue to exist when the other stops, it was thought, should have come to the view objects that continue to exist forever. Fragility of

most other things, surely disappearing in time, forced to represent the latter as a devastating and destructive

force, like a monster, devouring all life, respectively, so that long life of certain items presented their successful

resistance to this force and, therefore, those items life which was not supposed to end, had to be

presented as the final victory by time as to be inaccessible and not its application.

The Entity

The phenomenon is all that which does not belong to being in the strict sense of the word, but the existence

of that is due to the existence of which is dependent. Lacking thus in itself substance phenomenon, however, also has its essence, that is constant predicates. Consequently, there is no opposition between appearance and essence, and between the appearance and the fact that exists, which serves as the primary source of the phenomenon, or, perhaps, between the essence of the

phenomenon and the essence of things. This feature of the concept of nature can be expressed briefly so that

the entity is a constant predicate logic required subject, but there is no need for the actual subject.

The Glance

It can not be that the unity of knowledge, feelings, desires, and whose will you call them, there would have been recently

at a time out of nothing, but rather that knowledge, feelings and desires are essentially eternal and unchangeable, and the number is only one in all men, even all sentient beings. You and just as any other of itself taken a conscious being -

all in all. Therefore, this is your life you're also not the only part of the world events, and in a sense they

were entirely. Only this whole is not of such a nature that can be covered at a glance.

The Mirror

We are not born with an ‘I’ – the ego emerges only gradually as experience shapes our dense web of active symbols

into a tapestry rich and complex enough to begin twisting back upon itself. According to this view the psychological ‘I’ is a narrative fiction, something created only from intake of symbolic data and its own ability to create stories about itself from that data. The consequence is that a perspective (a mind) is a culmination of a unique pattern of symbolic activity

in our nervous systems, which suggests that the pattern of symbolic activity that makes identity,

that constitutes subjectivity, can be replicated within the brains of others.

The Consciousness

Intentionality refers to the notion that consciousness is always the consciousness of something. The word itself should

not be confused with the "ordinary" use of the word intentional, but should rather be taken as playing on the etymological roots of the word. Originally, intention referred to a "stretching out", and in this context it refers to consciousness "stretching out"

towards its object, although one should be careful with this image, seeing as there is not some consciousness first

that, subsequently, stretches out to its object. Rather, consciousness occurs as the simultaneity of a

conscious act and its object. Intentionality is often summed up as "aboutness."

The Immanence

Major faiths commonly devote significant philosophical efforts to explaining the relationship between immanence and transcendence, but these efforts run the gamut from casting immanence as a characteristic of a transcendent to subsuming transcendent personal in a greater immanent being to approaching the question of transcendence as

something which can only be answered through an appraisal of immanence.

More at Seem An Eternity and diary at When Light Is Gone

The Perception

If a tree exists outside of perception then there is no way for us to know that the tree exists. So then, what do we

mean by existence', what is the difference between perception and reality? Also, people may also say, if the tree exists outside of perception as common sense would dictate, then it will produce sound waves. However, these sound waves will not

actually sound like anything. Sound as it is mechanically understood will occur, but sound as it is

understood by sensation will not occur. So then, how is it known that 'sound as it is

mechanically understood' will occur if that sound is not perceived?

The Void Type

The void type, in several programming languages derived from C and Algol68, is the type for the result of a function that returns normally, but does not provide a result value to its caller. Usually such functions are called for their side effects, such as performing some task or writing to their output parameters. The usage of the void type in such context is comparable to that

of the syntactic constructs which define subroutines in Visual Basic and procedures in Pascal. It is also similar to the

unit type used in functional programming languages and type theory; however, there are some differences

in allowable usage, in that the void type is taken to be an empty type with no values.

The Cause

The inevitable separation of the generating causes of the other types of causality, as a preliminary methodological device,

is the final point of view of the researcher, as a result, and the results of the study need to get extremely scholastic and devoid of real philosophical content and interest. The relationship between the real causality and its true roots in a logical law,

or the principle of sufficient reason, is completely unexplained, the ratio of private and individual

reasons for a universal cause of all that exists is not certain.

The Reveal

The region revealed through sight, the ordinary objects we see around us, to the prison home, and the light of the fire

in it to the power of the Sun. And in applying the going up and the seeing of what's above to the soul's journey to the intelligible place, you not mistake my expectation, since you desire to hear it. At all events, this is the way the phenomena look to me: in the region of the knowable the last thing to be seen, and that with considerable effort, is the idea, but once seen, it must be

concluded that this is indeed the cause for all things of all that is right and beautiful, in the visible realm it gives

birth to light and its sovereign, in the intelligible realm, itself sovereign, it provided truth and intelligence,

and that the man who is going to act prudently in private or in public must see you it.

The Field

Understand something you can only advance through existing assumptions about him, not when it confronts us as

something completely mysterious. The fact that the anticipation can be a source of error in the interpretation of that prejudice and promoting understanding, and can lead to misunderstandings, only a reference to the limb of such a being as man,

and the manifestation of his limbs. The inevitable movement in a circle just in the fact that behind

the attempt to read and understand the intention something "here is written," "stand" our

own eyes and our own thoughts, with which we are "here" is visible.

The Inside

The criterion validity of anything is obvious. You must install the first evidence that will form the basis of reliable knowledge. This evidence must be apodictic, obvious now may become questionable later prove visibility illusion apodictically same evidence has the remarkable feature that not only is it generally confirms existence of obvious things in it, or related circumstances,

but at the same time by means of critical reflection is revealed as their non-existence is unthinkable.